Dungeon Crawler Carl

A LitRPG Podcast Earns Its First Official Review

A LitRPG Podcast Earns Its First Official Review, And No, I Wasn't Asked to Narrate It *Critics in Conversation* has published its first official review of a LitRPG podcast, and the subject is *Angel Down*.

3 min readChicago Review of Books
A LitRPG Podcast Earns Its First Official Review

Our Take: The Chicago Review of Books has issued its first official review of the *Dungeon Crawler Carl* series, and the verdict is a resounding "it's just really fun." For a literary outlet that prides itself on intellectual rigor, this admission is a bigger achievement than a platinum loot box. The conversation between reviewer Greg Zimmerman and bookseller-novelist Adi Alsaid covers the audiobook phenomenon, the series' surprising mainstream appeal, and the ongoing Dungeon Crawler Carl: Celestial expansion officially registered of the universe. What this means for you, Crawler, is that the dungeon has officially breached the walls of highbrow criticism. The gatekeepers have been killed by a cat with a tiara.

The practical takeaway here is that the series has crossed a threshold. When a publication that had to look up what LitRPG means devotes a full feature to Carl and Donut, the crawl is no longer a niche basement operation. Alsaid correctly identifies the appeal as a "pleasure area" rather than a guilty one, noting that Carl's conscientious, well-read sensibility makes him an easy protagonist to root for. Zimmerman, meanwhile, admits his sense of humor hasn't evolved since freshman-year Beavis and Butthead sessions, and that's the point. The dungeon's jokes land because they're stupid on purpose. This is not a flaw; it's a leveling mechanic. The review also confirms that the audiobook, narrated by Jeff Hays, has its own word-of-mouth momentum, which aligns with the upcoming live-action adaptation where Dungeon Crawler Carl live-action cameras roll in 2027, per The Express Tribune. If the book is this fun on the page, imagine the chaos on screen.

But here is the specific consequence you should watch: Zimmerman admits he nearly quit after 200 pages because the world-building felt repetitive. That is the collapse timer on reader patience. The series survives because the back half delivers plot threads that carry forward, and because Alsaid's analysis, that we watch Carl the way people watch a skilled YouTuber play a game, holds up. The dungeon succeeds by never letting you think too long. The review ends with Zimmerman declaring himself "all in" for the full ride, which is exactly the kind of loyalty Borant wishes it could buy. The real test is whether the upcoming Live-Action Dungeon Crawler Carl Cameras Roll in 2027 adaptation can replicate that feeling of watching someone beat a carefully constructed challenge without the benefit of a narrator's internal monologue. If the showrunners read this review, they now know the secret formula: keep the jokes stupid, the stakes high, and never, ever let the audience think too long about the fact that there are eight books and counting. The timer is ticking.

Source: Chicago Review of Books, "Critics in Conversation: On the Dungeon Crawler Carl Phenomenon", October 2024. Status: Confirmed

From Chicago Review of Books

Critics in Conversation is a “podcast on the page” feature in which contributors discuss a book or issue currently making headlines in the literary world. Read our piece on Angel Down here and Yesteryear here.

Here at the Chicago Review of Books, we take great pride in the intellectual rigor, insightfulness, and erudition we put into our literary criticism.

Read the original at Chicago Review of Books